The Implementation Guide is a resource for implementing this program. It provides important information about the staffing and functions necessary for administering this program in the user's setting. Additionally, the steps needed to carry out the research-tested program, relevant program materials, and information for evaluating the program are included. The Implementation Guide can be viewed and downloaded in the Products page.
Together for Sun Safety
|Program Title||Together for Sun Safety|
|Purpose||Designed to motivate sun protection behavior and reduce sun exposure. (2000)|
|Program Focus||Awareness building and Behavior Modification|
|Population Focus||Sun-exposed individuals|
|Age||Adults (40-65 years), Young Adults (19-39 years)|
|Race/Ethnicity||White, not of Hispanic or Latino origin|
|Setting||Home-based, Suburban, Urban/Inner City|
|Funded by||NCI (Grant number(s): CA62968)|
|User Reviews||(Be the first to write a review for this program)|
Although 90% of skin cancers are preventable, the disease has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Children are particularly at-risk because lifetime sun exposure and severe sunburns before age 20 may substantially elevate the risk of developing skin cancer. Well-known behaviors can significantly reduce the risk, such as the use of shade, sunscreens, and protective clothing; yet, people are often unwilling to comply with this advice. Effective strategies for enhancing compliance with prevention and control recommendations are needed.
Almost 2,000 parents with children aged 5 to11 years were identified for participation from pediatric offices and public school districts in the Tucson, Arizona metropolitan area. Consenting parents (N = 853) were pretested via telephone and randomly assigned to one of the cells in the factorial design: 2 (language intensity: high vs. low) x 2 (logical structure: deductive vs. inductive). Three persuasive prevention messages presented arguments on health outcomes of sun protection, parental values and responsibilities for own and child's health, and importance of physical appearance of skin. Parents received experimental messages in three newsletters and three brochures. Parents also received an introductory newsletter and three magnetic tip cards; language intensity and logical structure were not altered in these materials. Program effects were measured at posttest and at a 6-month follow-up.
- At posttest, compared with parents receiving low-intensity messages, parents who received the high-intensity messages:
- decreased the frequency of their own midday sun exposure.
- were more likely to say that they, in general, planned to protect themselves and their children more the following summer and planned to protect themselves and their children more in the upcoming winter.
- reported a larger increase in their planned frequency of applying sunscreen, using protective clothing and limiting midday sun exposure with their children in the upcoming winter.
- At posttest, parents receiving high-intensity deductive messages showed the largest increase in their planned frequency of applying sunscreen, wearing protective clothing, staying in the shade, and in their plans to protect themselves from the sun in the upcoming winter.
- At posttest, high-intensity inductive messages reduced compliance with recommendations to protect themselves in the upcoming winter.
- At 6-month follow-up, parents receiving high-intensity deductive messages reported more improved solar protection than parents receiving all other messages.
Please click on the related program(s) to review.
Go Sun Smart (GSS) in that:
- They are by the same developer/investigator with the same theoretical basis, focus but have different materials that are designed for different target audiences.
Buller DB, Burgoon M, Hall JR, Levine N, Taylor AM, Beach BH, Melcher C, Buller MK, Bowen SL, Hunsaker FG, Bergen A. (2000). Using Language Intensity to Increase the Success of a Family Intervention to Protect Children from Ultraviolet Radiation: Predictions from Language Expectancy Theory. Preventive Medicine, 30, 103-114.
Buller DB, Borland R, Burgoon M. (1998). Impact of Behavioral Intention on Effectiveness of Message Features. Evidence from the Family Sun Safety Project. Human Communication Research, 24 (3), 433-453.
Buller DB, Burgoon M, Hall JR, Levine N, Taylor AM, Beach B, Buller MK, Melcher C. (2000). Long-Term Effects of Language Intensity in Preventive Messages on Planned Family Solar Protection. Health Communication, 12(3), 261-275.
(Be the first to write a review for this program)