Promoting Sun Safety Among Zoo Visitors

Highlights
Program Title Promoting Sun Safety Among Zoo Visitors
Purpose Designed to motivate sun protection behavior and reduce sun exposure. (2001)
Program Focus Behavior Modification
Population Focus Sun-exposed individuals
Topic Sun Safety
Age Adolescents (11-18 years), Adults (40-65 years), Children (0-10 years), Young Adults (19-39 years)
Gender Female, Male
Race/Ethnicity This information has not been reported.
Setting Community
Origination United States
Funded by CDC (Grant number(s): U56/CCU914634)
RTIPs Scores
This program has been rated by external peer reviewers. Learn more about RTIPs program review ratings.
Research Integrity
4.1
Intervention Impact
4.0
Dissemination Capability
5.0
(1.0 = low    5.0 = high)
RE-AIM Scores
This program has been evaluated on criteria from the RE-AIM framework, which helps translate research into action.
Reach
N/A - Not Applicable
Effectiveness
66.7
Adoption
16.7
Implementation
57.1

The Need

The rates of both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers have been increasing in the United States. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a key risk factor, and much of this exposure is obtained prior to adulthood. Consequently, primary prevention programs to promote sun safety for children and their caregivers are particularly warranted. 

Each year, millions of children visit zoological parks, where they are exposed to UVR for long periods of time. Yet a 1998-1999 survey of accredited U.S. zoos conducted by the developers of Sun Safety Among Zoo Visitors found that only 5% of zoos offered any sun protection recommendations to their visitors. Therefore, zoo visitors would benefit from a combination of structural (e.g., shade, availability of sunscreen) and educational interventions. 

Back to Top

The Program

Description

Promoting Sun Safety Among Zoo Visitors is a multi-component intervention designed to reduce the UVR exposure of children and their caregivers during their visits to the zoo. The goal of the program is to increase sun safety by encouraging all zoo patrons to use sun safety items and encouraging those who do not bring their own sun safety items to purchase them at the zoo. 

The program uses several strategies to disseminate the message of sun safety behaviors and encourage the use of protective clothing and sunscreen, including: (1) a sun safety tip sheet for parents inserted in the zoo maps distributed to visitors at entry; (2) a stamping activity sheet for children on the flip side of the tip sheet; (3) coupons for discounts off the purchase of selected children's hats (i.e., targeted hats providing ideal amounts of shade) and sunscreen in zoo gift shops, attached to the tip sheet; (4) point-of-purchase signs in gift shops prompting visitors to purchase hats and sunscreens; (5) signs at selected animal exhibits about sun-protective adaptations; (6) incorporation of information on animal adaptations by bus tour narrators; (7) sunscreen reminder signs in restrooms; (8) sun safety reminder signs at stroller rental and bus and tram loading areas; and (9) thematically relevant children's arts and crafts activities. The theme of the program is animal adaptations for skin protection, such as elephants dusting their skin to prevent sunburn and meerkats having dark under-eye circles to prevent glare.

The stamping activity is a matching exercise in which children match five animals to five clues that explain how the animal protects itself from the sun's burning rays. At five corresponding animal exhibits, kiosks are installed with answers to the clue, a stamp with the appropriate animal, and an inkpad. As children visit each exhibit, they learn about the protective strategies and fill out the stamping sheet with the animal stamps. The arts and crafts activities, which were conducted in the Children's Zoo and staffed by zoo volunteers and staff and project staff, consisted of decorating a picture of an elephant with sand and grass and creating a wide-brim frog hat.

Implementation Guide

The Implementation Guide is a resource for implementing this program. It provides important information about the staffing and functions necessary for administering this program in the user's setting. Additionally, the steps needed to carry out the research-tested program, relevant program materials, and information for evaluating the program are included. The Implementation Guide can be viewed and downloaded in the Products page.

Back to Top

Community Preventive Services Task Force Finding

Guide to Community Preventive Services This program is an example of interventions in outdoor recreational and tourism settings (Sun Safety), which is recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, as found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. It is also an example of interventions targeting children's parents and caregivers (Sun Safety) which has an insufficient evidence finding from the Community Preventive Services Task Force, as found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Insufficient evidence means the available studies do not provide sufficient evidence to determine if the intervention is or is not effective. This does not mean that the intervention does not work. It means that additional research is needed to determine whether the intervention is effective. To expand understanding of this intervention category consider communicating with members from NCI's Research to Reality (R2R) community of practice who may be able to help you with your research efforts. Following is a link to start an online discussion with the R2R community of practice, after completing registration on the R2R site: https://researchtoreality.cancer.gov/discussions.
Back to Top

Time Required

The time required to administer the program includes 30 minutes to train zoo employees to incorporate narrations about animal adaptations during bus tours and learn how to integrate animal adaptations into arts and crafts activities. In addition, approximately 3 hours are required for the posting of sun safety messages (e.g., installing kiosks, signs, tip sheets, and coupons) in various areas of the zoo. 
Back to Top

Intended Audience

The primary audience is children ages 12 years and younger and their caregivers during zoo visits.
Back to Top

Suitable Settings

The program is designed to be administered at zoological parks.
Back to Top

Required Resources

The Promoting Sun Safety Among Zoo Visitors websites include the following materials:

-Tip Sheet for Visitors
-Discount Coupons - sunscreen and Sunwise hats
-Point-of-Purchase Sign - promoting coupons 
-Point-of-Purchase Sign - promoting hats, sunscreen, sunglasses
-Sunwise Animal Sticker
-Sunscreen Break Sticker
-Sign for Stroller Rental Area
-Rental Stroller Tag - for strollers without covering
-Rental Stroller Tag - for strollers with convertible covering
-Who Am I? - rubber stamp activity 
-Who Am I? - paper-and-pencil activity 
-Decorate-the-Elephant Art Activity
-Frog Visor Pattern
-Animal Crossword
-Animal Skins
-Animal Maze
-Animal Search
-List of Messages for Narrated Tours
-Messages for Signs at Animal Exhibits

All implementation materials are available at the Sunwise Stampede Web site for Zoo Staff, http://www.foundation.sdsu.edu/sunwisestaff/ . Additional materials for the general public are available at the Sunwise Stampede Web site for Zoo Visitors, http://www.foundation.sdsu.edu/sunwisestampede/

Back to Top

About the Study

The evaluation was conducted at two sites in southern California, with a winter study beginning in January and a summer study beginning in July. The intervention site was the San Diego Zoo, located near downtown San Diego. The comparison site, which received only the evaluation procedures, was the San Diego Zoo's Wild Animal Park, which is located in a relatively rural area approximately 29 miles from the zoo. The sites are operated by the same zoological society and sell similar items in their gift shops.

A nonequivalent control group design was used to evaluate the effects of a multi-component intervention on hat wearing by children and on the purchasing of sunscreen and select hats in gift shops. During the winter study, data were collected for a consecutive 10-week period. The first 4 weeks consisted of evaluation only at both sites (baseline phase), during which time the researchers documented hat and sunscreen use. This was followed by a 6-week period of intervention at the zoo only, with continued evaluation at both sites (intervention phase). The summer study consisted of 4 weeks each of a baseline and intervention phase, for a total of 8 weeks of data collection.

Two primary outcome measures were used: (1) direct, unobtrusive observations of hat use by children who appeared 12 years or younger as they exited the zoo and park sites and (2) sales of sunscreen and targeted hats at the zoo and park gift shops. For the observational measures, trained observers were stationed near the exit of the zoo and park on a portion of baseline and intervention phase days of both the winter and the summer study. Observers attempted to record data on all children appearing to be 12 years or younger as they came through the exit gate, noting the child's estimated age, gender, hat use (none, visor, cap/bonnet, flap hat, 2-in. brim, 3-in. brim, stroller/umbrella cover, or hood/backward cap), and sunburn level. When an infant's gender could not be determined, the "baby" category was used. Observations were conducted from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. in the winter study and from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. in the summer study. On approximately 51% and 60%, respectively, of the winter and summer observation days, a second observer also recorded data in order to obtain reliability estimates.

For the sales measure, the numbers of units of the targeted items sold each day of the winter and summer studies were obtained from the merchandising buyer. Data were also obtained from the marketing department on daily attendance rates; the researchers adjusted for this variable in the analyses.

Back to Top

Key Findings

 

Graph of Study Results

  • During the winter study, the rate of sunscreen sales (average sales per 1,000 visitors) increased significantly more (p<.05) for the intervention group compared to the control group, rising from 0.57 to 3.51 versus from 0.73 to 1.55 for the control group. In the summer study, the rate of sunscreen sales again increased significantly more (p<.01) for the intervention group compared to the control group, increasing from 3.27 to 5.31 versus a decrease from 4.15 to 3.65 for the control group. 

 

Graph of Study Results

  • During the summer study only, the rate of hat sales per 1,000 visitors increased significantly for the intervention group (p<.01), rising from 5.34 to 7.26, while the rate decreased from 3.87 to 3.69 for the control group.

Graph of Study Results

  • Observations of children's hat use at zoo and park exits showed that the percentage of children wearing "ideal hats" providing the most protection (flap, 2- or 3-in. brim, and stroller/umbrella) increased from 2.2% to 3.8% for the intervention group during the winter study, compared to an increase from 5.5% to 6.3% for the control group during the same period. A logistic regression showed that the odds of ideal hat use during intervention versus baseline phases were differentially higher at the zoo relative to the park (p<.01). No significant changes in the percentage of children wearing ideal hats were observed during the summer study.
Back to Top
Last Modified: 07/11/2014
  • View Notes

Use this area to take notes about how this program might work for you. Read More about RE-AIM.

Reach

Absolute number, proportion and representativeness of individuals who participate in the program.


(Max. 8 characters)

(Max. 8 characters)
(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)

Effectiveness

Impact on important outcomes, including potential negative effects, quality of life and economic factors.

(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)

Adoption

Absolute number, proportion and representativeness of settings and intervention agents willing and able to initiate the program.

(No max # of characters)

Implementation

At the setting level- refers to the fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's protocol, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. At the individual level- refers to clients' use of the intervention strategies.

(No max # of characters)

Maintenance

Please note that RE-AIM stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. However, since ?Maintenance? occurs after a program has been implemented, a notes section for this is not included as a part of this tool.