The Forsyth County Cancer Screening Project (FoCaS)

Highlights
Program Title The Forsyth County Cancer Screening Project (FoCaS)
Purpose Designed to improve the beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors regarding breast and cervical screening among low-income, predominately African-American, women age 40 and older. (1999)
Program Focus Awareness building
Population Focus Medically Underserved
Topic Breast Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening
Age Adults (40-65 years), Older Adults (65+ years)
Gender Female
Race/Ethnicity Black, not of Hispanic or Latino origin
Setting Clinical
Origination United States
Funded by NCI (Grant number(s): CA57016)
RTIPs Scores
This program has been rated by external peer reviewers. Learn more about RTIPs program review ratings.
Research Integrity
3.1
Intervention Impact for Cervical Cancer Screening
4.0
Intervention Impact for Breast Cancer Screening
2.0
Dissemination Capability
3.0
(1.0 = low    5.0 = high)
RE-AIM Scores
Beginning in 2012, new programs are scored on RE-AIM criteria. This program was posted prior to the inclusion of RE-AIM scores and does not have these scores included. Click on the information icon next to "RE-AIM Scores" above to learn more about RE-AIM.

The Need

In 2005, 11,999 women in the United States were diagnosed with cervical cancer, and 3,924 died from the disease. The same year, 186,467 women were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 41,116 died from the disease.  Older, low-income, and minority women are the most impacted by these cancers because they are less likely to be screened, which is believed to result in more late-stage cancers and lower survival rates. Underutilization of screening has been attributed to several factors including limited access and referral to preventive and therapeutic services, fear and fatalistic views of breast cancer along with distrust of the medical community, and the fact that physicians may be less likely to recommend screening to older or minority women.

Back to Top

The Program

Description

The Forsyth County Cancer Screening Project (FoCaS) is designed to (a) identify barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening faced by low-income women and health care providers and (b) address these barriers in a comprehensive program to help improve participation in breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women. FoCaS comprises both public health clinic in-reach strategies and community outreach strategies.

The public health clinic in-reach strategies include:
-- In-service and primary care conference training for health care providers
-- Visual prompts in exam rooms
-- Educational games
-- Abnormal test protocol (including alert stickers, a referral process for managing the care of women with abnormal test results, and a tracking system)
-- Posters and literature in waiting rooms
-- One-on-one counseling sessions and personalized letters for followup testing for women with abnormal results

The community outreach strategies include:
-- Monthly classes conducted by a health educator
-- A community party with food, educational classes, screenings, prizes, and information booths
-- A church program
-- Educational brochures to address barriers
-- Mass media
-- Birthday cards with the FoCaS logo
-- Targeted mailings and door knob hangers with invitations to events
-- One-on-one educational sessions in women's homes

Implementation Guide

The Implementation Guide is a resource for implementing this program. It provides important information about the staffing and functions necessary for administering this program in the user's setting. Additionally, the steps needed to carry out the research-tested program, relevant program materials, and information for evaluating the program are included. The Implementation Guide can be viewed and downloaded in the Products page.

Back to Top

Community Preventive Services Task Force Finding

Guide to Community Preventive Services This program is an example of one-on-one education interventions (Breast Cancer Screening), small media interventions (Breast Cancer Screening), one-on-one education interventions (Cervical Cancer Screening) and small media interventions (Cervical Cancer Screening), which are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force, as found in the Guide to Community Preventive Services.
Back to Top

Time Required

FoCaS was originally implemented over a 4-year period (including baseline survey data collection, intervention implementation, followup survey data collection, and transfer of successful interventions to the comparison city). Because FoCaS is a multifaceted intervention, time requirements will vary when replicated based on the activities selected to be implemented.

Back to Top

Intended Audience

The FoCaS program is intended for low-income women aged 40 and older.

Back to Top

Suitable Settings

Community outreach activities are implemented in community centers, individual homes, and community places of worship. Public heath clinic in-reach activities are implemented in the clinics' waiting and exam rooms.

Back to Top

Required Resources

Required resources include:
-- Class and community educational brochures
-- FoCaS newsletter
-- Sample birthday card
-- Church program materials (flyers and invitation and agenda for luncheon)
-- In-reach flyers for public health clinics advertising breast cancer awareness month
-- Outreach plan and community education intervention class schedule
-- Monthly class announcement flyers
-- Sample class outlines for monthly sessions and educational classes

Mass media techniques such as public bus ads and newspaper and radio ads can also be utilized. Costs associated with the program's implementation are not provided.

Back to Top

About the Study

The FoCaS Project was conducted over a four-year period in low-income housing communities in Winston-Salem and Greensboro, North Carolina. These communities served as the intervention city and comparison city, respectively.  All public health clinic in-reach strategies and community outreach strategies were made available to the communities located in Winston-Salem, although the extent to which individuals utilized these services is unknown. Baseline and 2.5-year followup data were obtained from independent cross-sectional samples in both the intervention and comparison cities. Samples were also drawn by random selection, stratified by age, among women who resided in the communities during the intervention period.

Of the 248 women who completed baseline surveys and the 302 women who completed followup surveys, the majority were aged 65 and older (baseline: 56.5%; followup: 61.3%); the remainder were primarily between 40 and 64 years of age (baseline: 43.5%; followup: 37.1%). Most participants were African American (baseline: 72.2%; followup: 78.5%)

Women were asked in face-to-face interviews about their compliance with mammography and Pap smear screening guidelines. For mammography, women aged 40 through 49 were within guidelines if they reported that they had received a mammogram within the past 2 years. Women aged 50 and older were within guidelines if they reported that they had received a mammogram within the past year. All women were within guidelines for Pap smear screening if they reported that they had received a Pap smear within the past 3 years.

Back to Top

Key Findings

  • The proportion of women in the intervention city reporting having had a mammogram within guidelines increased significantly from 31% to 56% (p=.049) over the 4 years of the intervention, with no significant increase in use of mammography in the comparison city.


Graph of Study Results

 

  • The proportion of women in the intervention city who had received a Pap smear within the past 3 years increased from 73% to 87% (p=.004), while the proportion decreased from 67% to 60% among women in the comparison city.


Graph of Study Results

Back to Top
Last Modified: 04/03/2012
  • View Notes

Use this area to take notes about how this program might work for you. Read More about RE-AIM.

Reach

Absolute number, proportion and representativeness of individuals who participate in the program.


(Max. 8 characters)

(Max. 8 characters)
(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)

Effectiveness

Impact on important outcomes, including potential negative effects, quality of life and economic factors.

(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)
(No max # of characters)

Adoption

Absolute number, proportion and representativeness of settings and intervention agents willing and able to initiate the program.

(No max # of characters)

Implementation

At the setting level- refers to the fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's protocol, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. At the individual level- refers to clients' use of the intervention strategies.

(No max # of characters)

Maintenance

Please note that RE-AIM stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. However, since ?Maintenance? occurs after a program has been implemented, a notes section for this is not included as a part of this tool.